Photo and Video in One

Nov 2, 2009

Now that you are planning your marriage it is vital to consider your marriage video. Doing all of it yourself could be a lot less expensive and although the technology is incredible when it comes to equipment as explained below, it is always better to get a pro to do the work if you'd like something really totally unique to keep as a memento.

All pro wedding video Sydney based firms use state of the art equipment, the single thing that sets them apart is the quality of work that they do, and this typically is reflected by their qualifications and experience. Your marriage video is going to be something you will cherish over the years so it's important that the person doing the shooting has some good testimonials from previous clients.

Marriage plans take time and so there is no actualneed to rush into getting a wedding videographer Sydney based company, take some time and ensure that they are going to provide you with a superb production as a cherished memento. If you decide that you are going to do the honeymoon and wedding video yourself, you may think about employing the Canon EOS 5D as it is a great camera for both videos and photos.

Given the amazing qualities that the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has, boasting a full 21.1 megapixel and an HD movie capability ; one has to ask the question, if this is the point where photographers and videographers will be doing the same job. Thinking about it, having only 1 kit for two purposes should be the 'it' gadget. Considering that you do not have to carry heavy loads of cameras, stands and lenses, having only one small camera should do the job. But is it actually up to it? Are we really into it?

There's an engaging convergence taking place though that is being driven by the hardware makers. Increasingly video capture is being found in everything from mobile phones and PDAs to dig cams. Also, the cost of near-broadcast quality video gear has dropped to the point that cameras and revising systems that were the fantasy of creative film makers simply a short while back are now in reach of virtually everyone.

Taking an efficient image means telling a story in a single image. Through selection of subject, composition, focus, cropping and so on, the photographer selects those things that he wants to convey the meaning intended, or not. This is a demanding art as well as craft. With film or video, motion pictures as they once were universally called, there is the added component of multiple viewpoints achieved through modifying, as well as sound. A mood can be created. A complicated story can be told. The viewer's perceptions and emotions can be manipulated to reach the creator's informational or emotional ends. But this is weird, at least to the quality standard that we have set. Most similar productions need two, or three, or more people with specialised talents to accomplish a similar thing.

Nevertheless, even those of us with lesser experience and talents can still find pleasure in producing short videos and still footage that may be creatively satisfying, and also even achieve wider recognition. The point is that for some folk video production can be a very satisfying accessory to still photography, if not a alternative. And, with the new generation of high definition equipment that has just become available this year at grounded prices, the visible quality of what can be produced is nothing short of fantastic.

So, will this be the medium of the future? What will this be called? What will you call the person that is both photographer and a videographer? There is just so much difference that both mediums are disagreeing with each other which one is best. Merging both will be tough as it is confusing in a way that in an artist's standpoint, a picture says more than 1,000 words silently than a video that announces everything in motion and in words.

If I am going to have my opinion, using only 1 piece of equipment for photography and videography should be best kept for the fans and noobs alike. Professionals are keener on conventions ; they need to be left with what they are trained to do. A photographer should stick to his SLR, and a videographer stick with his video camera. In ing this though, the professional wedding videographer is drawn to the Canon 5D SLR solely for its ability to supply fantastic video pictures, usually only seen in 100k plus video cameras. The sole downside is, the SLR is basically built for taking pictures and not much thought is given to the ergonomics and functionality for videos. ( Maybe with its recognition among film makers this may soon change ). With the comparisons of differences and likenesses, it is concluded that in this time, it still isn't satisfactory for both parties to combine as a one job description. Perhaps two more years maybe.